Brad Bortner wrote:
Eric,I did stop him and let him know he did not have permission. The county passed a no rifle shooting ordinance for the valley floor because of road hunters shooting at deer and elk without regard to farms, houses and people. If he had kept going or had given me grief then I would have called the sheriff. I?m confident he knew he was trespassing but don?t think a sign would have stopped him. The clueless was how he expected to retrieve an animal if he got one. His choices were limited to wade the ditch or drive up my driveway past my house and barn. Guess I should have let him shoot one and then prohibited him from retrieving it without going thru the ditch.
My 2 cents
He could not give a rats A$$ about retrieving the Elk.
Killing it no matter what, was his goal. A Poacher, and a Slob Poacher at that. What the media in such situations, when they are apprehended, deems "hunters".
Road hunting/shooting = No Scruples, not clueless. The new kinda "clever".
As for No Trespassing signs. The same folks use them as a invite, cuz it is so damn hard to prosecute in many places. In many places ya better have deep pockets, to have yer land surveyed again. That will cost ya more $$$ than the fine levied, if they loose. My neighbor went through that on his property.
PA sets up taxidermy robo deer, and the road hunters come to it like bees to honey. Then the hammer falls, in the first state to ever issue hunting licenses in the USA.
You pass laws, ya better sure as hell be able to enforce them, or else just a waste of time.
"Art does not reproduce what is visible - but makes things visible." ~ Paul Klee, artist, 1920