Long Slow Day

Jeff Reardon

Well-known member
Supporter
Hoping for ducks moving ahead of the snow storm, we planned our typical late season puddle duck/diver hunt at one of my favorite spots this morning. This is a big tidal bay, above several sets of "reversing falls" into which a lot of whistlers often pile on an east wind and rain or snow, especially once the fresh water has all frozen. It can also hold big numbers of black ducks. On the rare occasions that all things cooperate, we get both, occasionally with geese mixed in.

Today things did not cooperate. The storm was about 8 hours later than we needed, leaving us with flat calm, a so-so tide, and nothing to make ducks move. At dawn we watched the usual flight of black ducks fly head overhead from still unfrozen fresh water to our west to more open ocean east of our bay. Over the next 2 hours we watched them reverse this course as they flew back in smaller groups. One small group gave us a half-hearted look and two quacks from about 40 yards in the air.

A few divers finally started to fly so we redeployed to the official Cosmic Whistler Point, in hopes we'd be sitting there when the tide turned and the wind swung east to move the birds. That never happened, but we did have a few small groups of passing whistlers give us a little attention but keep going. We finally fixed that with some strategic decoy redeployment, and pulled in a few pairs, but they stayed shy and landed on the long side. One of our group took a pair of buffleheads. I dropped one drake whistler that fell into a hard running tide, giving Thor the Wonder Lab an opportunity to strut his stuff on a LONG retrieve. Not bad for a non-quite-2-year-old. (He's still a pain-in-the-ass in a canoe, but a hell of a water dog once you get there.)

Unfortunately the mature drake turned out to be a Barrows, which is a protected species in Maine and required a call to the warden. Since it is generally acknowledged that telling Barrows from Commons on the wing is not possible, there is no penalty for accidentally taking one, so long as they are promptly reported and turned in. It turned out the warden was in our area and asked me to meet him where a main road crosses the tidal river below the Bay, so I had a lovely paddle (eagle, seal, nice view of one of Maine's loveliest tidal rivers) followed by a pleasant chat. It turns out the warden was one I run into occasionally closer to home and a pretty serious waterfowler himself. We agreed it had been an awfully slow season, that the number duck hunters is dwindling, that a warming climate sucks for duck and deer hunting, and that it would have been a lot better with a little snow and wind. He thanked me for "not just shoving it in the mud like most guys do", and I think he was glad to be dealing with me instead of the horde of desperate deer hunters out on the last day of muzzleloader season. He never even asked to see my license or check my shells and shotgun plug, so I guess my reputation must be intact.

My buddies took a couple more buffies while I was out, probably stirred up by my paddle. We packed it in soon after, 11 hours after leaving home. As we paddled in, the snow started and the wind swung east. When we crossed the bridge over the river on our way home a steady stream of whistlers was flying from the ocean over the highway and back into the bay. Timing is everything, they say.

I'd be back tomorrow am if Maine allowed Sunday hunting. Does that make me dedicated, a little twisted, or both?
 
Last edited:
They're actually listed as a state threatened species. It was a little controversial when the listing occurred, in part because they can be legally harvested both north of us in Canada and in the states to our south. It's not clear to me that listing is appropriate for a species that doesn't breed here and can be legally hunted where it does breed, but they are rare enough that some kind of conservation plan makes sense.

I actually think a better conservation option would have been to close the areas where Barrows are known to congregate in numbers-to all diver hunting. There are only a handful in the state--two in particular, and not including our spot today--where incidental take is pretty common. I don't hunt those areas, nor do most hunters I know, at least for diving ducks.

I believe Quebec allows harvest, but once you have a Barrows in your bag you cannot take another goldeneye, which also seems a sensible way to deal with it. I should check in with the state biologist to see how common this is. It's the second time it's happened to a party I've been in, but I'm one of only a handful of people I know who actually target whistlers.
 
Bummer you couldn’t keep the Barrows. I don’t exactly follow Maine’s logic on this reg either.
 
Carl said:
Bummer you couldn’t keep the Barrows. I don’t exactly follow Maine’s logic on this reg either.

Giving them up is so that people don't target them, I'd think.
 
IDing Barrows is really doable on the wing and worth looking into if you are routinely running into them. Upper wing pattern is pretty distinctive.
 
tod osier said:
Carl said:
Bummer you couldn’t keep the Barrows. I don’t exactly follow Maine’s logic on this reg either.

Giving them up is so that people don't target them, I'd think.

I mean the the closed season in Maine only in the whole flyway
 
tod osier said:
IDing Barrows is really doable on the wing and worth looking into if you are routinely running into them. Upper wing pattern is pretty distinctive.

If you know of an instructional video or other resource to help with this, I'm interested. Static images are not that useful, as they don't show what I'd be seeing. At 50 mph with the wings beating and blurred, I don't think I can make out the fine details on the upper wing. I've talked to a lot of people about exactly that, including several who would qualify as experts on Maine bird and/or waterfowl ID. All of them have said they can't do it on the wing with the naked eye.
 
Jeff Reardon said:
tod osier said:
IDing Barrows is really doable on the wing and worth looking into if you are routinely running into them. Upper wing pattern is pretty distinctive.

If you know of an instructional video or other resource to help with this, I'm interested. Static images are not that useful, as they don't show what I'd be seeing. At 50 mph with the wings beating and blurred, I don't think I can make out the fine details on the upper wing. I've talked to a lot of people about exactly that, including several who would qualify as experts on Maine bird and/or waterfowl ID. All of them have said they can't do it on the wing with the naked eye.

This isn't a tough ID, especially if you don't have to be perfect at it, but get it right most of the time to reduce the accidental harvest significantly. I don't really have much of a positive feeling for an expert that says that they can't do it. Take it all in... bill size, head shape, white spot/crescent on the face, wing/back pattern and it should be doable for most birds. I'd just look at field guides and go from there. To learn and in the field, IDing commons is just as important as IDing Barrows. Sibley field guide is good.
 
Last edited:
I just can't believe most hunters can. I would contend that 75% of hunters don't know what they shot until it is in the boat... and then 3% still don't know if it isn't a drake.
 
Phil Nowack said:
I just can't believe most hunters can. I would contend that 75% of hunters don't know what they shot until it is in the boat... and then 3% still don't know if it isn't a drake.

I didn't say that most could. That experts should and that anyone could learn.
 
IMO LEO are going to speak in defense of the law (usually) and the law is written to the masses, not the super extraordinary.
 
I knew this law existed, but what do they do with the bird? Could you ask the warden for the meat? Most states have a quirky law or two if you go through them all.
 
Chris--I don't know what they do with the bird. I do intend to follow up with them and see if there are annual reports on incidental take of Barrow's. I'd be interested to know how large the take is. When the species was reviewed for listing, there was information that said less than half of Maine duck hunters shot any whistlers, and based on wing survey returns, of the ones harvested, about 2% were Barrow's. I may be off by a little on those numbers, but it was not common. Everyone I know--hunters, wardens, biologists--has been surprised when it's happened at the spots I hunt.

As for the ID question, maybe it's just my 50 year old uncorrected eyes and lack of skill, but under hunting conditions with flying birds, distinguishing characteristics like head shape, bill shape, bill color, and the shape of the spot on the head are not discernible to me. I CAN make those out on birds on the water (if they are close enough), and with binoculars on both sitting and flying birds. But with naked eye, unless the bird is close enough to swat with my gun barrel, I'm not seeing those details on a passing whistler, which is probably 70% of the shots they offer.

It may be that the wing pattern is discernible if you know what to look for on a FLYING bird, as wing patterns on flying hen mallards are easily distinguishable from black ducks. I'm serious about being interested in resources to help learn that. But all the online resources I've found show this on either dead ducks with the wings prominently displayed, or on ducks sitting on the water (where other traits work better for me to make the ID if I have a close or magnified view).
 
Jeff Reardon said:
I'm serious about being interested in resources to help learn that.

Sibley guide to birds if you don't have it you should, anyway.

The issue is that Common Goldeneyes are so easy to ID that you don't know what they look like. If you knew Commons better and Barrows, it would be easier.
 
Last edited:
I shot a barrows on lake champlain in vermont about 5 years ago, though I didn't know it at first. I considered myself rather good with my bird ID both on the wing and in hand. Well this bird I shot was a hen which I hadn't looked at that hard when the pup retrieved it assuming it was just in fact a hen common. I had been given a copy of lemaster's bill finder guide and in a slow moment decided to check it out against my birds in the bag. When the book led me to the fact that I was holding a hen barrows I just about fell off my rock. I was humbled and I carefully examine any birds I harvest now before assuming what they are. Barrows are present here though not abundant and we have no special regulations around their harvest.
 
Jeff- we had a similar experience on Saturday... Had whisters come on while we were setting up and then whiffed on one. Had a few buffies that we didn't shoot at and got snuck by one mallard. I expected a lot more out of the day...
 
Back
Top