Cormorant Die Off

Darin Clark

Active member
I got this today and thought I would pass it along for those in the Great Lakes region.




National Wildlife Health Center
Wildlife Health Bulletin 2016-06
Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus in Double-Crested Cormorants

To: Natural Resource/Conservation Managers
From: Dr. Jonathan Sleeman, Center Director, USGS National Wildlife Health Center
Date: August 2, 2016

The USGS National Wildlife Health Center is receiving reports of sick or dead double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus), predominantly juveniles, from the Great Lakes region. Common clinical signs observed are increased fledgling mortality at rookeries, neck weakness, unilateral wing paralysis, incoordination, and tremors. Occasionally, concurrent mortality in other species including gulls and pelicans is reported. We are currently investigating events from multiple locations in central and southern Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Virulent Newcastle Disease virus (vNDV) has been confirmed by genetic sequencing in cormorants submitted from Mille Lacs County, Minnesota. Cormorants from Blue Earth, Rice, and Big Stone Counties in Minnesota and Dodge County in Wisconsin have also screened positive for avian paramyxovirus-1 (APMV-1) and further characterization of the virus is on-going to determine if it is vNDV. None of the dead gulls or pelicans collected in association with cormorant mortality have been positive for APMV-1. Our experience with previous vNDV outbreaks has shown that sympatric species are rarely affected by vNDV, and cause-of-death determination for the other species (e.g., gulls and pelicans) is on-going. All birds have screened negative for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.

Wildlife and Domestic Animal Significance: Certain strains of APMV-1 can cause significant wild bird mortality, but these events are typically limited to juvenile double-crested cormorants. Some strains of APMV-1 classified as vNDV, including some strains isolated from cormorants, can also cause significant disease even in vaccinated poultry and are reportable to state and federal agricultural officials.

Human Health Considerations: APMV-1 can cause mild self-limiting conjunctivitis in humans, therefore the use of eye protection or face shields should be considered when investigating these events. As a routine precaution when handling any sick or dead birds, personal protective equipment including gloves, rubber boots, and disposable or cloth coveralls should be worn and hands should be thoroughly washed afterwards.

Disease Control and Biosecurity: Because of the potential for some strains of vNDV to cause mortality in domestic poultry, it is important to practice good biosecurity when investigating any mortality event involving double-crested cormorants. Wear boots, gloves, and outer clothing that can be cleaned and disinfected, bagged and washed, or bagged and discarded. Carcasses collected from these sites should be disposed of on-site (by burying or incineration) rather than transported to other locations for disposal. Equipment, including transportation vehicles, used at a morbidity or mortality site should be washed to remove organic material and mud, then disinfected with 10% household bleach solution (9 parts water:1 part bleach) or other suitable disinfectant, such as Virkon, as soon as possible after use. Limit visits to the affected site until young have fledged and moved off the colony. As a precaution, limiting contact with pet birds and poultry for 5 days is advised for any personnel that have recently visited an affected site or handled contaminated animals or materials.

Please continue to monitor your area and contact us (608-270-2480; NWHC-epi@usgs.gov) to report cormorant mortality in new locations and to coordinate potential submissions. In addition, please share your observations with your agency's wildlife health team. Poultry producers are encouraged to review their biosecurity measures. For backyard or poultry concerns, call your agricultural extension agent, local veterinarian, or the State veterinarian. Or, call the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) toll-free at 1-866-536-7593.
[/url]
Disease Investigation Services
To request diagnostic services or report wildlife mortality, please contact the NWHC at 608-270-2480 or by email at NWHC-epi@usgs.gov, and a field epidemiologist will be available to discuss the case. To report wildlife mortality events in Hawaii or Pacific Island territories, please contact the Honolulu Field Station at 808-792-9520 or email Thierry Work at thierry_work@usgs.gov. Further information can be found at http://www.nwhc.usgs.gov/services/. See also the Wildlife Mortality Reporting and Diagnostic Services Request Worksheet.
 
Darin

thanks for posting - hopefully the "some strains" of the virus will not affect other waterfowl
 
Gee, what a shame. Perhaps, this will solve a problem created by an introduced species that somehow became "protected". Same thoughts on other species. Hoping they stay healthy!
Cormorant rookeries have become blighted areas on the St. Lawrence and elsewhere.
 
Believe me, I'm not shedding any tears over the lose of some cormorants. I just hope it doesn't spread to other waterfowl.


My main reason for posting was to make people aware so they don't jump to the avian influenza conclusion
 
Darin,
I live near the Bay of Green Bay. Cormorants have achieved nuisance level. Seems that over population always meets with a correction of some sort. Cormorant surveys have shown them to be major perch fry predators. This is not to popular as the "perch fry" is a cult thing around Green Bay. Spend allot of time on the Bay in the fall and will be watching for deceased cormorants. What would be the course of action if bodies are found?
Thanks, Frank
 
Introduced?? Nope they are native to North America.
 
Last edited:
As Carl said, double crested cormorants are a native protected species. If you find dead ones, call the local DNR or FWS, or USGS National Wildlife Health Lab.
 
South Carolina has had 2 or 3 years of experimental hunting seasons and have killed 1000's. They absolutely hate them down here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Frank, after watch several islands in southern Green Bay literally disappear over the last two decades after cormorant rookeries became established on them: initially to deforestation via cormorant guano droppings, eventually succumbing to wind and wave action associated erosion. I would say nuisance is a marked understatement!
 
MN culled the blackjacks on Leech Lake for a couple years earlier this decade.

Marsh Lake in Western MN experiences the die offs as well. I've never been out there for it but have seen the waste while hunting. Out here it's Newcastle Disease: http://www.mprnews.org/story/2010/08/06/bird-die-off

Growing up there were never Cormorants around. Now they fly Canada geese around the Mpls/St Paul metro.
 
I remember several years ago there was a significant die-off of cormorants in the 1000 islands area of New York. It was determined to be lead poisoning, mainly from the lethal end of a 12 gauge....
 
30+ uears ago, Maine salmon biologists used to give out boxes of free shells and encourage folks to shoot cormorants to prevent predation on salmon smolts. Like many "predator control" programs, this worked better as a feel-good exercise for salmon anglers frustrated that returns were low and predators were eating some salmon than it did as informed, biologically-based salmon restoration.

The problems for salmon were of course things like the dams that eliminated access to more than 90% of their habitat, the lack of any other sea-run fish for cormorants to eat instead of salmon smolts, climate change and other human impacts reducing the productivity of the remaining freshwater habitat, and unknown changes at sea that have drastically reduced at sea survival and therefore smolt-to-adult salmon return rates.

There may be some cases where predator control really is important and effective to manage rare or desirable species. One example may be predators concentrated immediately below dams that put a real hurt on Pacific salmon and steelhead runs. But I'll argue that in most cases the real problem is not the predators--it's other human impacts that have given the predators an unnatural situation where they can do a lot more damage than they would in a less altered environment.

Perhaps we'd be better off addressing the human impacts and habitat limitations instead of blasting away at predators.
 
I can only speak to nesting adult pairs culling efforts in northern Lake Michigan, the Beaver Island and Door Peninsula archipelago islands, and the Bays de Noc/Green Bay area.

After a multi-year egg-oiling effort proved largely ineffective, growing concerns over loss of habitat for other nesting waterbirds via cormorant quano induced vegetation death(highly acidic quano, on a water body with a very high non-carbonate hardness buffer value), as well as complete loss of passerine species nesting habitat sites on these island rookeries, moved USFWS and USDA personnel to initiate shooting of adult double crested cormorants at these sites.

You can contact the folks at the Green Bay Wildlife Refuge for timeline photos documenting nesting habitat losses incurred at several island rookeries post double crested cormorant colonization.
 
I also will not miss some cormorants. Wouldn't wish to eliminate them but when that is all you see flying in a morning of hunting something is out of balance.
 
What is out of balance is HABITAT. Less and less everyday. Just in my 66+ years (54 hunting). I've seen a helluva lot of habitat go Bye-By. All conservation attempts are trying to hold on to, is what is left. Build new? Only Mother Nature can do that, and she always takes back what she wants, when she wants.

The reason for the Duck Stamp increase being used for easement, is to help save what is in private hands. It will boil down to Fresh CLEAN WATER, (the most precious commodity on earth) much sooner than later. Not just for waterfowl, but mankind.
 
With cormorants, its just the opposite, damming up all those rivers to create man-made lakes created thousands and thousands of acres of new freshwater foraging habitat with ready made nesting islands.
 
Last year FWS and USDA were sued and this May they lost on the cormorant depredation orders that authorized the shooting and egg oil programs in the Great Lakes and New England states and the shooting at aquaculture facilities. So the control programs in 24 states are now off the books until the agencies can justify them again. The problem is like many other predator control programs, it's really hard and expensive to measure success. You can count dead cormorants, occasionally document ecosystem effects, but determining that killing cormorants is having an actual impact on sport fisheries in addition to all the other things effecting the fish populations is hard.
 
Last year FWS and USDA were sued and this May they lost on the cormorant depredation orders that authorized the shooting and egg oil programs in the Great Lakes and New England states and the shooting at aquaculture facilities. So the control programs in 24 states are now off the books until the agencies can justify them again. The problem is like many other predator control programs, it's really hard and expensive to measure success. You can count dead cormorants, occasionally document ecosystem effects, but determining that killing cormorants is having an actual impact on sport fisheries in addition to all the other things effecting the fish populations is hard.


Brad, who sued and why?
 
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), 'cause they didn't like it.

Won on a technicality, basically the judge said USFWS didn't use proper data.
Type of bullshit NEPA claim tree huggers and bunny huggers use all the time to stop stuff that should otherwise move forward.
 
Back
Top